You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students
Deborah L. Leitsch
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 53, No. 3 (Sep., 2004), pp. 313-323
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123304
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Morality, Accounting ethics, Moral judgment, Ethical instruction, Business ethics, Ethical behavior, Standard deviation, Ethical codes, Financial accounting, Corporate policies
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the impact of moral issues on the moral decision-making process within the field of accounting. In particular, the study examined differences in the perceptions of the underlying characteristics of moral issues on the specific steps of the moral decision-making process of four different accounting situations. The research results suggested that student's perception of the components of moral intensity as well as the various stages of the moral decision-making process was influenced by the type and intensity of the moral issue. In general, accounting student's perceptions of the importance of these variables varied between less unethical and more unethical accounting issues. The differences in perceptions of four moral intensity components: magnitude of consequences, concentration of effect, probability of effect and proximity stood out more in the accounting issues analyzed. The findings presented in this research extend the existing understanding about the importance of the components of moral intensity in the ethical decision-making process of accounting processionals. The results can be integrated into revised or newly adopted company codes of ethics to comply with the requirements of the newly enacted Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002. They can also be used to enhance ethics coursework and training programs in educational settings and industry.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2004 Springer