You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Regulatory Perspectives on Business Ethics in the Curriculum
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 54, No. 4, Business Ethics in the Curriculum: Of Strategies Deliberate and Emergent (Nov., 2004), pp. 349-356
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123355
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Outcomes of education, Business ethics, Curricula, Environmental ethics, Business schools, Ethical instruction, Corporate responsibility, Environmental management, Learning, Commercial regulation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The paper begins by providing a classification of the regulatory environment within which Business Schools, particularly those in the U.K., operate. The classification identifies mandatory vs. voluntary and prescriptive vs. permissive requirements in relation to the Business and Management curriculum. Three QAA Subject Benchmark Statements relating to Business and Management, the AMBA MBA guidelines, and the EQUIS and AACSB standards are then compared and contrasted with each other. The cognitive and affective learning outcomes associated with business ethics contained in each of these statements are then detailed. The conclusion is that from an international perspective compliance with relevant standards, while requiring due consideration, should be relatively straightforward. From a U.K. perspective, however, the QAA Subject Benchmark Statements provide the most rigorous standards and to meet these will require considerable development on the part of many Business Schools in the U.K. For those academics engaged in this area, however, this represents an opportunity not to be missed.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2004 Springer