Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Weathering the Storm: How Wind and Waves Impact Western Grebe Nest Placement and Success

Joseph H. Allen, Gary L. Nuechterlein and Deborah Buitron
Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology
Vol. 31, No. 3 (Sep., 2008), pp. 402-410
Published by: Waterbird Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148349
Page Count: 9
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Weathering the Storm: How Wind and Waves Impact Western Grebe Nest Placement and Success
Preview not available

Abstract

Nests of many over-water nesting birds are frequently subjected to wave action from repeated wind-storms. Colonial grebes often lose over 50% of nests in any particular breeding season to wave action, depending on factors such as storm activity and habitat quality. We examined nest structure survival in a colony of Western Grebes (Aechmophorus occidentalis) in relation to wave action due to wind. Initial nests were 66% successful in hatching at Lake Christina, Minnesota, in 2005 compared to only 48% in 2006. In 2005, initial nests that survived and hatched young were closer to the central tuber-mat of the colony and closer to individual bulrush island centers than were nests lost during storms. In 2006, a year of high storm activity, nests located near the colony edge most prone to wave attack were less likely to last the season and produce young than were nests in central or more protected areas of the colony. Buffer zones of vegetation surrounding the nest were the single most important factor in attenuating waves. Buffer zone stem density was less important than the amount of buffer between nest and wave attack, which may be a major factor colony founders select for when evaluating nest placement sites within a colony.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
402
    402
  • Thumbnail: Page 
403
    403
  • Thumbnail: Page 
404
    404
  • Thumbnail: Page 
405
    405
  • Thumbnail: Page 
406
    406
  • Thumbnail: Page 
407
    407
  • Thumbnail: Page 
408
    408
  • Thumbnail: Page 
409
    409
  • Thumbnail: Page 
410
    410