You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Quality at General Practice Consultations: Cross Sectional Survey
John G. R. Howie, David J. Heaney, Margaret Maxwell, Jeremy J. Walker, George K. Freeman and Harbinder Rai
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Vol. 319, No. 7212 (Sep. 18, 1999), pp. 738-743
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25185820
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: General practice, Social psychology, Music practice, Medical practice, Health outcomes, Health care outcome assessment, Questionnaires, Social issues, Primary health care, Health care quality
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Objectives To measure quality of care at general practice consultations in diverse geographical areas, and to determine the principal correlates associated with enablement as an outcome measure. Design Cross sectional multipractice questionnaire based study. Setting Random sample of practices in four participating regions: Lothian, Coventry, Oxfordshire, and west London. Participants 25 994 adults attending 53 practices over two weeks in March and April 1998. Main outcome measures Patient enablement, duration of consultation, how well patients know their doctor, and the size of the practice list. Results A hierarchy of needs or reasons for consultation was created. Similar overall enablement scores were achieved for most casemix presentations (mean 3.1, 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 3.1). Mean duration of consultation for all patients was 8.0 minutes (8.0 to 8.1); however, duration of consultation increased for patients with psychological problems or where psychological and social problems coexisted (mean 9.1, 9.0 to 9.2). The 2195 patients who spoke languages other than English at home were analysed separately as they had generally higher enablement scores (mean 4.5, 4.3 to 4.7) than those patients who spoke English only despite having shorter consultations (mean 7.1 (6.9 to 7.3) minutes. At individual consultations, enablement score was most closely correlated with duration of consultation and knowing the doctor well. Individual doctors had a wide range of mean enablement scores (1.1-5.3) and mean durations of consultation (3.8-14.4 minutes). Doctors' ability to enable was linked to the duration of their consultation and the percentage of their patients who knew them well and was inversely related to the size of their practice. At practice level, mean enablement scores ranged from 2.3 to 4.4, and duration of consultation ranged from 4.9 to 12.2 minutes. Correlations between ranks at practice level were not significant. Conclusions It may be time to reward doctors who have longer consultations, provide greater continuity of care, and both enable more patients and enable patients more.
BMJ: British Medical Journal © 1999 BMJ