You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Testing for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Validation and Diagnostic Yield of a near Patient Test in Primary Care
Anne E. Duggan, Catherine Elliott and Richard F. A. Logan
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Vol. 319, No. 7219 (Nov. 6, 1999), pp. 1236-1239
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25186294
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Endoscopy, Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Primary health care, Dyspepsia, General practice, Helicobacter pylori, False negative errors, Infections, Gastroenterology, Nurses
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
Objective To evaluate the performance of a near patient test for Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care. Design Validation study performed within a randomised trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia. Setting 43 general practices around Nottingham. Subjects 394 patients aged 18-70 years presenting with recent onset dyspepsia. Main outcome measures Results of the FlexSure test compared with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; HM-CAP) with an identical antigen profile and with results of an earlier validation study in secondary care. Diagnostic yield of patients undergoing endoscopy on the basis of their FlexSure result compared with those of patients referred directly for endoscopy. Results When used in primary care FlexSure test had a sensitivity and specificity of 67% (95% confidence interval 59% to 75%) and 98% (95% to 99%) compared with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% (87% to 97%) and 90% (83% to 97%) when used previously in secondary care. Of the H pylori test and refer group 14% (28/199) were found to have conditions for which H pylori eradication was appropriate compared with 23% (39/170) of the group referred directly for endoscopy. Conclusions When used in primary care the sensitivity of the FlexSure test was significantly poorer than in secondary care. About a third of patients who would have benefited from H pylori eradication were not detected. Near patient tests need to be validated in primary care before they are incorporated into management policies for dyspepsia.
BMJ: British Medical Journal © 1999 BMJ