You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Brief Intervention During Hospital Admission To Help Patients To Give Up Smoking After Myocardial Infarction And Bypass Surgery: Randomised Controlled Trial
Peter Hajek, Tamara Z. Taylor and Peter Mills
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Vol. 324, No. 7329 (Jan. 12, 2002), pp. 87-89
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25227142
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Smoking cessation, Cigarette smoking, Myocardial infarction, Cigar smoking, Nurses, Hospital admissions, Carbon monoxide, Psychoeducational intervention, Hospital units, Control groups
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Objective To evaluate a smoking cessation intervention that can be routinely delivered to smokers admitted with cardiac problems. Design Randomised controlled trial of usual care compared with intervention delivered on hospital wards by cardiac rehabilitation nurses. Setting Inpatient wards in 17 hospitals in England. Participants 540 smokers admitted to hospital after myocardial infarction or for cardiac bypass surgery who expressed interest in stopping smoking. Intervention Brief verbal advice and standard booklet (usual care). Intervention lasting 20-30 minutes including carbon monoxide reading, special booklet, quiz, contact with other people giving up, declaration of commitment to give up, sticker in patient's notes (intervention group). Main outcome measures Continuous abstinence at six weeks and 12 months determined by self report and by biochemical validation at these end points. Feasibility of the intervention and delivery of its components. Results After six weeks 151 (59%) and 159 (60%) patients remained abstinent in the control and intervention group, respectively (P=0.84). After 12 months the figures were 102 (41%) and 94 (37%) (P=0.40). Recruitment was slow, and delivery of the intervention was inconsistent, raising concerns about the feasibility of the intervention within routine care. Patients who received the declaration of commitment component were almost twice as likely to remain abstinent than those who did not receive it (P<0.01). Low dependence on tobacco and high motivation to give up were the main independent predictors of positive outcome. Patients who had had bypass surgery were over twice as likely to return to smoking than patients who had had a myocardial infarction. Conclusions Single session interventions delivered within routine care may have insufficient power to influence highly dependent smokers.
BMJ: British Medical Journal © 2002 BMJ