You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration
Vol. 42, No. 1 (Oct., 1988), pp. 63-76
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2523172
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Arbitration, Men, Women, Statistical models, Criminal justice, Criminal offenses, Control variables, Statistical significance, Mathematical dependent variables, Statistical estimation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time.
ILR Review © 1988 Sage Publications, Inc.