You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
"Light Manufacturing": The Feminization of American Office Work, 1900-1930
Sharon Hartman Strom
Vol. 43, No. 1 (Oct., 1989), pp. 53-71
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2523208
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Working women, Men, Office management, White collar workers, Employment, Feminization, Support personnel, Women, Machinery, Workforce
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study challenges the impression left by most historical accounts of office work that the feminization of office work was total, inevitable, and somehow "natural." The author argues that when business machines and rationalized systems of office work came together (around 1900), women were initially chosen to fill many of the new jobs partly because of the long-standing use of women in similarly routinized "light manufacturing"; and they were subsequently hired in ever-greater numbers primarily because the pervasive discrimination that denied them most career opportunities ensured that they would accept low wages. The feminization of office work was not, however, as extensive as the literature generally claims. By using the marriage bar, employers were able to create an office work force segmented by gender, with more prestigious job titles and almost all promotion opportunities reserved for men.
ILR Review © 1989 Sage Publications, Inc.