You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Reinsurance Decision Making and Expected Utility
Danny Samson and Howard Thomas
The Journal of Risk and Insurance
Vol. 50, No. 2 (Jun., 1983), pp. 249-264
Published by: American Risk and Insurance Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/252352
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Reinsurance, Proportional reinsurance, Expected utility, Risk aversion, Utility functions, Insurance providers, Risk premiums, Expected values, Insurance premiums, Net assets
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Utility theory is developed and applied in this article as a choice criterion for decisions concerning which types and extents of reinsurances are most appropriate for an insurer. Using an undimensional utility function, reinsurance options are evaluated by calculating an upper bound premium (i.e., the maximum that the insurer should consider paying for a particular reinsurance agreement), which can be compared with market rates. Comparisons between reinsurance options can thus be accurately made as a function of the probability density function of the original loss, the modifications made by various ceding agreements, and the risk attitude of the insurer.
The Journal of Risk and Insurance © 1983 American Risk and Insurance Association