You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Do Unions Capture Monopoly Profits?
Barry T. Hirsch and Robert A. Connolly
Vol. 41, No. 1 (Oct., 1987), pp. 118-136
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2523869
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Industrial concentration, Industrial unions, Industrial market, Market share, Monopoly, Coefficients, Labor unionization, Economic capital, Labor management relations, Financial market structures
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper challenges the conclusion reached in recent studies that unions reduce profits exclusively in highly concentrated industries. From their review of previous studies and their analysis of 1977 data on 367 Fortune 500 firms, the authors conclude that there is no convincing evidence that concentration produces monopoly profits for unions to capture. Moreover, they find that the union wage effect is not greater in concentrated industries, as suggested by the hypothesis that unions capture concentration-related profits. Evidence is found suggesting that a firm's market share, its expenditures on research and development, and its protection from foreign competition provide more likely sources for union rents than does industry concentration.
ILR Review © 1987 Sage Publications, Inc.