Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Phylogenomic Analyses of Lophophorates (Brachiopods, Phoronids and Bryozoans) Confirm the Lophotrochozoa Concept

Martin Helmkampf, Iris Bruchhaus and Bernhard Hausdorf
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 275, No. 1645 (Aug. 22, 2008), pp. 1927-1933
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25249745
Page Count: 7
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phylogenomic Analyses of Lophophorates (Brachiopods, Phoronids and Bryozoans) Confirm the Lophotrochozoa Concept
Preview not available

Abstract

Based on embryological and morphological evidence, Lophophorata was long considered to be the sister or paraphyletic stem group of Deuterostomia. By contrast, molecular data have consistently indicated that the three lophophorate lineages, Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda and Phoronida, are more closely related to trochozoans (annelids, molluscs and related groups) than to deuterostomes. For this reason, the lophophorate groups and Trochozoa were united to Lophotrochozoa. However, the relationships of the lophophorate lineages within Lophotrochozoa are still largely unresolved. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian analyses were performed based on a dataset comprising 11 445 amino acid positions derived from 79 ribosomal proteins of 39 metazoan taxa including new sequences obtained from a brachiopod and a phoronid. These analyses show that the three lophophorate lineages are affiliated with trochozoan rather than deuterostome phyla. All hypotheses claiming that they are more closely related to Deuterostomia than to Protostomia can be rejected by topology testing. Monophyly of lophophorates was not recovered but that of Bryozoa including Ectoprocta and Entoprocta and monophyly of Brachiozoa including Brachiopoda and Phoronida were strongly supported. Alternative hypotheses that are refuted include (i) Brachiozoa as the sister group of Mollusca, (ii) ectoprocts as sister to all other Lophotrochozoa including Platyzoa, and (iii) ectoprocts as sister or to all other protostomes except chaetognaths.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1927
    1927
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1928
    1928
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1929
    1929
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1930
    1930
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1931
    1931
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1932
    1932
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1933
    1933