You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Why Did Male Pension Coverage Decline in the 1980s?
William E. Even and David A. MacPherson
Vol. 47, No. 3 (Apr., 1994), pp. 439-453
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2524976
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Employee pension plans, Pension plans, Defined benefit pension plan, Employment, Pension eligibility, Private pensions, Old age benefits, Employment statistics, Industrial unions, Coefficients
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This analysis of 1979 and 1988 May Current Population Survey data suggests explanations for why male pension coverage declined during the 1980s, and why the decline was particularly pronounced among young workers. During the 1980s, employment shifted toward jobs with lower pension coverage, and this shift was more pronounced among young workers than among older workers. More important than the reduction in the percentage of workers offered pensions, however, was reduced participation in pension plans. One factor contributing importantly to declining participation rates was the growing share of pensions that were 401 (k) plans; under such plans, participation is more voluntary than it is under other plans, and young workers are more likely than older workers to decline to participate.
ILR Review © 1994 Sage Publications, Inc.