You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Analysis of Covariance Using the Rank Transformation
W. J. Conover and Ronald L. Iman
Vol. 38, No. 3, Special Issue: Analysis of Covariance (Sep., 1982), pp. 715-724
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2530051
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Statistics, Covariance, P values, Raw data, Null hypothesis, Applied statistics, Datasets, Degrees of freedom, Simulations, Statistical models
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The rank transformation refers to the replacement of data by their ranks, with a subsequent analysis using the usual normal theory procedure, but calculated on the ranks rather than on the data. Rank transformation procedures have previously been shown by the authors to have properties of robustness and power in both regression and analysis of variance. It seems natural to consider the use of the rank transformation in analysis of covariance, which is a combination of regression and analysis of variance. In this paper the rank transformation approach to analysis of covariance is presented and examined. Comparisons are made with the rank transformation procedure given by Quade (1967, Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 1187-1200), and some 'standard' data sets are used to compare the results of these two procedures. A Monte Carlo simulation study examines the behavior of these methods under the null hypothesis and under alternative hypotheses, with both normal and nonnormal distributions. All results are compared with the usual analysis of covariance procedure on the basis of robustness and power.
Biometrics © 1982 International Biometric Society