You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Radial-Distance Models for the Line-Transect Method
R. J. Hayes and S. T. Buckland
Vol. 39, No. 1 (Mar., 1983), pp. 29-42
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2530804
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Line-transect estimation of wildlife populations can be based on either right-angle distances or radial distances. Estimation based on radial distances requires more restrictive assumptions about the mechanism by which observations are generated. We examine this mechanism and show that the mean sighting angle may frequently be larger than predicted by Hayne's fixed-distance model or by Eberhardt's variable-distance model. The modified and generalized Hayne's models are also investigated. An alternative approach, based on hazard-rate analysis, is suggested, but we conclude that a nonparametric right-angle-distance model will generally result in more reliable estimation than any radial-distance model.
Biometrics © 1983 International Biometric Society