You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Using Latent Class Models to Characterize and Assess Relative Error in Discrete Measurements
Mark A. Espeland and Stanley L. Handelman
Vol. 45, No. 2 (Jun., 1989), pp. 587-599
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2531499
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Dentists, Statistical models, Teeth, Dental models, Disease models, Statistics, Parametric models, Biometrics, Modeling, Observational research
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Whenever a definitive standard is not available to mark accuracy in a classification process, discrete measurement error can be discussed only in relative terms. If strong assumptions concerning the underlying discrete processes can be made, latent class models allow one to characterize patterns of agreement/disagreement among raters while simultaneously producing "consensus" estimates of prevalence. A hypothetical definitive standard serves as the latent factor. The discrete data are treated as incomplete and log-linear models can be used to parameterize latent class models and extensions of latent class models. Data from the radiographic diagnosis of dental caries by five dentists were explored to estimate prevalence, assess relative error, and examine the validity of several traditional assumptions concerning diagnostic reliability. Latent class analysis allowed a more detailed description of diagnostic error than provided by commonly used summary statistics.
Biometrics © 1989 International Biometric Society