You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility"
Carol A. E. Nickerson
Vol. 53, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 1503-1507
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2533516
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Correlation coefficients, Coefficients, Estimators for the mean, Statistical variance, Analysis of variance, Drug evaluation, Biometrics, Correlations, Analytical estimating, Population mean
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Lin (1989, Biometrics 45, 255-268) objected to the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient as a way to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements between two trials of an assay or instrument and developed an alternative called the concordance correlation coefficient. It is noted that intraclass correlation refers not to a single coefficient but to a group of coefficients and that Lin's alternative is nearly identical to a subset of the coefficients in this group.
Biometrics © 1997 International Biometric Society