You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Pope Joan Polemic in Early Modern France: The Use and Disabuse of Myth
Barbara Sher Tinsley
The Sixteenth Century Journal
Vol. 18, No. 3 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 381-398
Published by: Sixteenth Century Journal
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2540724
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Popes, Protestantism, Catholicism, Polemics, Churches, Christian history, History instruction, Renaissance literature, Lutheranism, Theology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Pope Joan, invented by a thirteenth century monk-chronicler, was believed to have reigned at Rome during the Middle Ages. John Hus said this reign invalidated the papal succession, and later Luther and Calvin followed suit. Many Catholic scholars were also misled. Following the lead of one who was not, Onofrio Panvinio (d. 1568), Florimond de Raemond, a Bordeaux parlementaire, debunked the fable in his popular Erreur Populaire de la Papesse Jane (1587), reprinted fifteen times. Raemond's review of church history was a defence of papal primacy and infallibility. It helped free religious controversy from a dependence on fictitious "evidence," introducing ordinary readers to the problems of historical research.
The Sixteenth Century Journal © 1987 Sixteenth Century Journal