You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation
Jolita Kisielius and Brian Sternthal
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 12, No. 4 (Mar., 1986), pp. 418-431
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/254302
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The effect of vividness on attitudinal judgments is a controversial issue. Experimental evidence indicates that vividness often has no effect on attitudinal judgments; however, there is also evidence that vividness can enhance or undermine the favorableness of attitudinal judgments. In this article, the authors introduce the availability-valence hypothesis to predict and explain the effects of vividness and to account for the frequent observation of a null effect.
Journal of Consumer Research © 1986 Oxford University Press