You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Assessing Attribute Importance: A Comparison of Six Methods
James Jaccard, David Brinberg and Lee J. Ackerman
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 12, No. 4 (Mar., 1986), pp. 463-468
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/254305
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Consumer research, Marketing, Birth control, Attribution theory, Correlations, Statistical models, Psychological assessment, Factor analysis, Social psychology, Psychological attitudes
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Six methods of measuring attribute importance were evaluated for convergent validity. The methods were (1) an open-ended elicitation approach, (2) an information-search approach based on Jacoby's behavioral process technology, (3) direct ratings of importance, (4) conjoint measurement, (5) indices based on Jaccard's subjective probability approach, and (6) a paired comparison approach. The convergent validity of importance methods was investigated for two product classes: birth control and cars. Results indicated relatively low levels of convergence among measures.
Journal of Consumer Research © 1986 Oxford University Press