You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Suturing Versus Conservative Management Of Lacerations Of The Hand: Randomised Controlled Trial
James Quinn, Steven Cummings, Michael Callaham and Karen Sellers
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Vol. 325, No. 7359 (Aug. 10, 2002), pp. 299-300
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25452033
Page Count: 2
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
Objective To assess the difference in clinical outcome between lacerations of the hand closed with sutures and those treated conservatively. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department in a tertiary hospital. Participants Consecutive patients presenting between 16 February and 30 November 2000 with uncomplicated lacerations of the hand (full thickness < 2 cm; without tendon, joint, fracture, or nerve complications) who would normally require sutures. 154 patients were eligible, 58 refused, and 5 were missed; 91 patients with 95 lacerations were enrolled. Intervention Participants were randomised to suturing or conservative treatment. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was cosmetic appearance after three months, rated on a previously validated visual analogue scale. Duration of treatment, pain during treatment, patients' assessment of their outcome, and the time for patients to resume normal activities were also measured. Results Participants treated with sutures and those treated conservatively did not differ significantly in the assessment of cosmetic appearance by independent blinded doctors after three months: 83 mm v 80 mm, (mean difference 3 (95% confidence interval - 1 to 8) mm) on the visual analogue scale. The mean time to resume normal activities was the same in both groups (3.4 days). Patients treated conservatively had less pain (difference 18 (12 to 24) mm) and treatment time was 14 (10 to 18) min shorter. Conclusion Similar cosmetic and functional outcomes result from either conservative treatment or suturing of small uncomplicated lacerations of the hand, but conservative treatment is faster and less painful.
BMJ: British Medical Journal © 2002 BMJ