You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Historical Contingency and the Evolution of a Key Innovation in an Experimental Population of Escherichia coli
Zachary D. Blount, Christina Z. Borland and Richard E. Lenski
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 105, No. 23 (Jun. 10, 2008), pp. 7899-7906
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25462703
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Genetic mutation, Evolution, Citrates, Escherichia coli, Genetics, Phenotypes, Population ecology, Biological adaptation, Ecological genetics, Population growth
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The role of historical contingency in evolution has been much debated, but rarely tested. Twelve initially identical populations of Escherichia coli were founded in 1988 to investigate this issue. They have since evolved in a glucose-limited medium that also contains citrate, which E. coli cannot use as a carbon source under oxic conditions. No population evolved the capacity to exploit citrate for >30,000 generations, although each population tested billions of mutations. A citrate-using (Cit⁺) variant finally evolved in one population by 31,500 generations, causing an increase in population size and diversity. The long-delayed and unique evolution of this function might indicate the involvement of some extremely rare mutation. Alternately, it may involve an ordinary mutation, but one whose physical occurrence or phenotypic expression is contingent on prior mutations in that population. We tested these hypotheses in experiments that "replayed" evolution from different points in that population's history. We observed no Cit⁺ mutants among 8.4 × 10¹² ancestral cells, nor among 9 × 10¹² cells from 60 clones sampled in the first 15,000 generations. However, we observed a significantly greater tendency for later clones to evolve Cit⁺, indicating that some potentiating mutation arose by 20,000 generations. This potentiating change increased the mutation rate to Cit⁺ but did not cause generalized hypermutability. Thus, the evolution of this phenotype was contingent on the particular history of that population. More generally, we suggest that historical contingency is especially important when it facilitates the evolution of key innovations that are not easily evolved by gradual, cumulative selection.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2008 National Academy of Sciences