Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

In Defense of "Provincializing Europe": A Response to Carola Dietze

Dipesh Chakrabarty
History and Theory
Vol. 47, No. 1 (Feb., 2008), pp. 85-96
Published by: Wiley for Wesleyan University
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478726
Page Count: 12
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
In Defense of "Provincializing Europe": A Response to Carola Dietze
Preview not available

Abstract

This response to Carola Dietze's critique of "Provincializing Europe" takes up for examination three key expressions or ideas on which the original argument of the book was founded: hyperreal Europe, historicism, and political modernity. I appreciate the spirit of Dietze's engagement with the book, but I show that her critique is based on a degree of misapprehension of these three central ideas. While clarifying the details and the degree of my disagreement with Dietze, I provide my own critique of Dietze's proposal of "equal histories" by arguing that Dietze has not named or explained the unit with respect to which different histories could be considered equal. I also argue that Dietze's proposals about judging societies only by their "own" standards, and basing human dignity on the idea of a "human nature" that could be seen as a "constant," do not solve the problems she sees with my book and are themselves open to some serious historical and logical criticism.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[85]
    [85]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
86
    86
  • Thumbnail: Page 
87
    87
  • Thumbnail: Page 
88
    88
  • Thumbnail: Page 
89
    89
  • Thumbnail: Page 
90
    90
  • Thumbnail: Page 
91
    91
  • Thumbnail: Page 
92
    92
  • Thumbnail: Page 
93
    93
  • Thumbnail: Page 
94
    94
  • Thumbnail: Page 
95
    95
  • Thumbnail: Page 
96
    96