You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Ten Years of Public Interest Disclosure Legislation in the UK: Are Whistleblowers Adequately Protected?
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 82, No. 2, The European Identity in Business and Social Ethics: The Eben 20th Annual Conference in Leuven (Oct., 2008), pp. 497-507
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482304
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Employment, Whistleblowing, Tribunals, Public welfare, Research universities, Common law, Good faith, Criminal motive, Appellate courts, Employee motivation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Purpose The purpose of this article is to assess the operation of the UK's Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA 1998) during its first 10 years and to consider its implications for the whistleblowing process. Method The article sets the legislation into context by discussing the common law background. It then gives detailed consideration to the statutory provisions and how they have been interpreted by the courts and tribunals. Results In assessing the impact of the legislation's approach to whistleblowing both in the UK and elsewhere, the author draws upon empirical research. Conclusion The author concludes that PIDA 1998 has not adequately protected whistleblowers and makes 12 recommendations for change. Despite the European Commission's acknowledgement that whistleblowers can play a part in the fight against corruption, the author notes that common standards for their protection still seem a long way off.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2008 Springer