You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Means Testing versus Universal Provision in Poverty Alleviation Programmes
New Series, Vol. 57, No. 225 (Feb., 1990), pp. 119-129
Published by: Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2554085
Page Count: 11
Preview not available
This paper contrasts the use of means-tested and universal schemes in the alleviation of poverty. Using a class of poverty measures, we illustrate the trade-off from that the fact that means testing is costly to both the government and the claimant, while universal provision entails a leakage to the non-poor. The paper provides numerical as well as analytical results.
Economica © 1990 London School of Economics