You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Effect of the Interval between Withdrawal of Progestagen Pessaries and Time of PMS Administration on Oestrus and Ovulation in Cyclic Ewes
J. F. Roche
Irish Journal of Agricultural Research
Vol. 7, No. 1 (Apr., 1968), pp. 1-6
Published by: TEAGASC-Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25555460
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Pessaries, Ewes, Ovulation, Lambing, Livestock farms, University administration, Hormones, Sheep, Laparotomy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Pessaries containing 20 mg fluorogestone acetate (SC-9880) were administered intravaginally to 125 (mainly crossbred) ewes of varying ages. The ewes were allotted randomly on a basis of breed and age to four groups of approximately equal numbers. Three groups received 5 IU PMS per lb body weight at one of the following intervals: 4 days before withdrawal of the pessary (-4 days), 2 days before (-2 days) and at the time of pessary withdrawal (0 days). The fourth group received the pessaries alone. All ewes were bred to Suffolk rams of known fertility at the controlled oestrus and allowed to proceed to lambing. Time of PMS treatment affected the interval from pessary withdrawal to onset of oestrus but not the duration of oestrus. The ovulation rate was significantly higher in groups given PMS at -4 days and -2 days than in the 0-day and the no-PMS groups. The lambing rates followed a similar pattern although, with the numbers available, the differences did not attain statistical significance.
Irish Journal of Agricultural Research © 1968 TEAGASC-Agriculture and Food Development Authority