Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs. Gamenya and Kite) and Triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to Waterlogging

C. J. Thomson, T. D. Colmer, E. L. J. Watkin and H. Greenway
The New Phytologist
Vol. 120, No. 3 (Mar., 1992), pp. 335-344
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the New Phytologist Trust
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2557727
Page Count: 10
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs. Gamenya and Kite) and Triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to Waterlogging
Preview not available

Abstract

Responses of two genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs. Gamenya and Kite) and one genotype of triticale (Triticosecale cv Muir) were evaluated in stagnant solution culture and in waterlogged soil, using 23- to 36-d-old plants. Stagnant nutrient solutions decreased shoot fresh weight of Gamenya by 21% compared with aerated plants, while shoot fresh weight of Muir was unaffected. Reductions in nodal root fresh weight under stagnant conditions were also less for Muir than Gamenya Aerenchyma in nodal roots of stagnantly grown plants accounted for 6.7 and 12.7% of the root cross sectional area for Gamenya and Muir, respectively Oxygen supplied via this aerenchyma was substantially greater for Muir than Gamenya, and greatest for nodal roots of Kite Elongation rates of stagnantly grown nodal roots in an O2- free medium reflected the amount of O2 supplied via the aerenchyma, and were 0.11, 0.17 and 0.27 mm h-1 for Gamenya, Muir and Kite, respectively Waterlogging in soil decreased the redox potential from +600 to -200 mV after 35 d. Waterlogging decreased shoot fresh weight of Gamenya, Kite and Muir by 63-82% compared with drained plants, with similar reductions in growth of seminal roots Nodal root growth was little affected by waterlogging in soil, although Muir had a 1.6-2.4-fold greater nodal root mass than Gamenya and Kite Furthermore, after two cycles of 7 d waterlogging and 7 d drainage the seminal roots of Muir were at least double the length of Gamenya and Kite Under the same waterlogged conditions, the shoot growth of rice (Oryza sativa cv Calrose) was much greater than for wheat and triticale, and this reflected differences in morphology and anatomy of the root systems Nodal root/shoot ratios indicated the major factor limiting shoot growth of wheat was the small mass of nodal roots per plant. However, a possible additional factor is the poor function of nodal roots of wheat and triticale in waterlogged soil.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[335]
    [335]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
336
    336
  • Thumbnail: Page 
337
    337
  • Thumbnail: Page 
338
    338
  • Thumbnail: Page 
339
    339
  • Thumbnail: Page 
340
    340
  • Thumbnail: Page 
341
    341
  • Thumbnail: Page 
342
    342
  • Thumbnail: Page 
343
    343
  • Thumbnail: Page 
344
    344