You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Administrative Succession and Organizational Performance: How Administrator Experience Mediates the Succession Effect
Jeffrey Pfeffer and Alison Davis-Blake
The Academy of Management Journal
Vol. 29, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 72-83
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/255860
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Business management, Athletic teams, Pastors, Basketball, Professional sports, Games, Baseball, Coaching, Recordings, Leadership
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Analysis of data for 22 teams in the National Basketball Association (NBA) indicated that succession has no effect on subsequent team performance when prior performance is controlled, a result consistent with those of other studies. However, when the competence of new coaches is included in the analysis, it appears that succession affects subsequent performance. Teams in which succession occurred, and in which (1) the coach had a good prior record, (2) had prior experience in the NBA or ABA, or (3) had brought about performance improvements in other teams, performed better than teams whose new coaches either lacked experience or had performed less well in the past. The results suggest that attempts to estimate succession effects need to consider the competence of successors.
The Academy of Management Journal © 1986 Academy of Management