You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Vol. 60, No. 3 (Sep., 2009), pp. 647-657
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Society for the Philosophy of Science
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25592023
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Property law, Bridges, Intellectual property law, Legal entities, Real property law, Reductionism, Exhaustion, Statutory law, Philosophy of mind, Metaphysics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In his recent article 'Consciousness and Reduction', Ausonio Marras argues that functional reduction must appeal to bridge laws and thus does not represent a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. In response, I first argue that even if functional reduction must use bridge laws, it still represents a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. Further, I argue that Marras does not succeed in showing that functional reduction must use bridge laws.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science © 2009 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science