Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras

Kevin Morris
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Vol. 60, No. 3 (Sep., 2009), pp. 647-657
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25592023
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras
Preview not available

Abstract

In his recent article 'Consciousness and Reduction', Ausonio Marras argues that functional reduction must appeal to bridge laws and thus does not represent a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. In response, I first argue that even if functional reduction must use bridge laws, it still represents a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. Further, I argue that Marras does not succeed in showing that functional reduction must use bridge laws.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[647]
    [647]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
648
    648
  • Thumbnail: Page 
649
    649
  • Thumbnail: Page 
650
    650
  • Thumbnail: Page 
651
    651
  • Thumbnail: Page 
652
    652
  • Thumbnail: Page 
653
    653
  • Thumbnail: Page 
654
    654
  • Thumbnail: Page 
655
    655
  • Thumbnail: Page 
656
    656
  • Thumbnail: Page 
657
    657