You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Vol. 60, No. 3 (Sep., 2009), pp. 647-657
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Society for the Philosophy of Science
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25592023
Page Count: 11
Preview not available
In his recent article 'Consciousness and Reduction', Ausonio Marras argues that functional reduction must appeal to bridge laws and thus does not represent a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. In response, I first argue that even if functional reduction must use bridge laws, it still represents a genuine alternative to Nagelian reduction. Further, I argue that Marras does not succeed in showing that functional reduction must use bridge laws.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science © 2009 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science