You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit

Charles A. O'Reilly III, Jennifer Chatman and David F. Caldwell
The Academy of Management Journal
Vol. 34, No. 3 (Sep., 1991), pp. 487-516
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL:
Page Count: 30
Subjects: Management & Organizational Behavior Business Sociology
Find more content in these subjects: Management & Organizational Behavior Business Sociology
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


This article brings together three current themes in organizational behavior: (1) a renewed interest in assessing person-situation interactional constructs, (2) the quantitative assessment of organizational culture, and (3) the application of "Q-sort," or template-matching, approaches to assessing person-situation interactions. Using longitudinal data from accountants and M.B.A. students and cross-sectional data from employees of government agencies and public accounting firms, we developed and validated an instrument for assessing person-organization fit, the Organizational Culture Profile (OCP). Results suggest that the dimensionality of individual preferences for organizational cultures and the existence of these cultures are interpretable. Further, person-organization fit predicts job satisfaction and organizational commitment a year after fit was measured and actual turnover after two years. This evidence attests to the importance of understanding the fit between individuals' preferences and organizational cultures.

Notes and References

This item contains 88 references.

  • 1
    Stephenson, 1953
  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. 1985. Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7: 263-295. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Man- agement Review, 14: 20-39.
  • Barley, S.1983. Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Admin- istrative Science Quarterly, 28: 393-413.
  • Barley, S., Meyer, G., & Gash, D. 1988. Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners, and the pragmatics of normative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 24-60.
  • Bem, D., & Allen, A. 1974. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81: 506-520.
  • Bem, D., & Funder, D. 1978. Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 85: 485-501.
  • Block, J.1978. The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Block, J., Block, J., & Morrison, A. 1981. Parental agreement-disagreement on child rearing orientations and gender-related personality correlates in children. Child Development, 52: 965-974.
  • Brewer, M.B.1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 393-400.
  • Brief, A., & Roberson, L. 1989. Job attitude organization: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19: 717-727.
  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
  • Caldwell, D., & O'Reilly, C. 1990. Measuring person-job fit using a profile comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 648-657.
  • Caldwell, D., Chatman, J., & O'Reilly, C. 1990. Building organizational commitment: A multi- firm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 245-261.
  • Chatman, J. 1988. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Chatman, J.1989. Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person- organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14: 333-349.
  • Cooke, R., & Rousseau, D. 1988. Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group and Organizational Studies, 13: 245-273.
  • Davis, S.1984. Managing corporate culture. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Davis-Blake, A., & Pfeffer, J. 1989. Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organi- zational research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 385-400.
  • Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. 1982. Corporate cultures. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Diener, E., Larsen, R., & Emmons, R. 1984. Person x situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 580- 592.
  • Downey, H., Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. 1975. Congruence between individual needs, organi- zational climate, job satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 149-154.
  • Enz, C.1988. The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 284-304.
  • Fichman, M.1988. Motivational consequences of absence and attendance: Proportional hazard estimation of a dynamic motivation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 119-134.
  • Geertz, C.1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gough, H., & Heilbrun, A. 1980. The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Gouldner, A.1954. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
  • Graham, W.1976. Commensurate characterization of persons, groups, and organizations: De- velopment of the Trait Ascription Questionnaire (TAQ). Human Relations, 29: 607-622.
  • Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Harrison, J., & Carroll, G. 1991. Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: in press.
  • Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D., & Sanders, G. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 286-316.
  • Holland, J.L.1985. Making vocational choices (2d ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Joyce, W., & Slocum, J. 1984. Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 721-742.
  • Joyce, W., Slocum, J., & Von Glinow, M. 1982. Person-situation interaction: Competing models of fit. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 3: 265-280.
  • Kalbfleisch, J., & Prentice, R. 1980. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley.
  • Kenrick, D., & Funder, D. 1988. Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43: 23-35.
  • Keon, T., Latack, J., & Wanous, J. 1982. Image congruence and the treatment of difference scores in organizational choice research. Human Relations, 35: 155-165.
  • Kilmann, R.1984. Beyond the quick fix. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kilmann, R., Saxton, M., & Serpa, R. 1986. Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kunin, T.1955. The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 8: 65-78.
  • Lamiell, J.1981. Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36: 276-289.
  • Lofquist, L., & Dawis, R. 1969. Adjustment to work. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Louis, M.1980. Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 226-251.
  • Louis, M.1983. Organizations as culture-bearing milieux. In L. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism: 186-218. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Luthans, F., & Davis, T. 1982. An idiographic approach to organizational behavior research: The use of single case experimental designs and direct measures. Academy of Management Review, 7: 380-391.
  • Martin, J., & Siehl, C. 1983. Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1): 52-64.
  • Meir, E., & Hasson, R. 1982. Congruence between personality type and environment type as a predictor of stay in an environment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21: 309-317.
  • Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N. J. 1984. Testing the "side-bet" theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 372-378.
  • Moreland, R.1985. Social categorization and the assimilation of "new" group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 1173-1190.
  • Morita, J., Lee, T., & Mowday, R. 1989. Introducing survival analysis to organizational research- ers: A selected application to turnover research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 280- 292.
  • Mount, M., & Muchinsky, P. 1978. Person-environment congruence and employee job satisfac- tion: A test of Holland's theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13: 84-100.
  • Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. 1980. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior: Applying a congruence perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 9(3): 35-51.
  • Nunnally, J.C.1978. Pychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., III. 1977. Personality-job fit: Implications for individual attitudes and perfor- mance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18: 36-46.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., III. 1989. Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4): 9-25.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., III, Caldwell, D., & Mirabile, R. 1990. More than a mirage: Disposition- situation interaction as explanations of work behavior. Working paper, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., III, & Chatman, J. 1986. Organizational commitment and psychological attach- ment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 492-499.
  • Ouchi, W.1981. Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ouchi, W., & Wilkins, A. 1985. Organizational culture. In R. Turner (Ed.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 11: 457-483. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • Parsons, T.1951. The social system. New York: Free Press.
  • Pervin, L.1968. Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psy- chological Bulletin, 69: 56-68.
  • Peters, L., & Sheridan, J. 1988. Turnover research methodology: A critique of traditional designs and a suggested survival model alternative. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 6: 231-262. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. 1982. In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Rokeach, M.1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
  • Rousseau, D.1990. Quantitative assessment of organizational culture: The case for multiple measures. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Frontiers in industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 3: 153-192. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rynes, S., & Gerhart, B. 1990. Interviewer assessments of applicant "fit": An exploratory in- vestigation. Personnel Psychology, 43: 13-34.
  • Saffold, G.1988. Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: Moving beyond "strong" culture. Academy of Management Review, 13: 546-558.
  • Sampson, E.1978. Personality and the location of identity. Journal of Personality, 46: 552- 568.
  • Schein, E.1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schneider, B.1987. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40: 437-453.
  • Selznick, P.1949. TVA and the grass roots. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Smircich, L.1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 339-359.
  • Spokane, A.1985. A review of research on person-environment congruence in Holland's theory of careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26: 306-343.
  • Springfield, A.1988. An Aristotelian resolution of the idiographic versus nomothetic tension. American Psychologist, 43: 425-430.
  • Stephenson, W.1953. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stryker, E., & Serpe, R. 1982. Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example. In W. Ickes & E. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior: 119-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Super, D.1957. The psychology of careers. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Swidler, A.1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51: 273-286.
  • Terborg, J.1981. Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6: 569-576.
  • Tom, V.1971. The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6: 573-592.
  • Trice, H., & Beyer, J. 1984. Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials. Academy of Management Review, 9: 653-669.
  • Tsui, A., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. 1989. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423.
  • Tuma, N., & Hannan, M. 1984. Social dynamics: Models and methods. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Wanous, J.P.1977. Organizational entry: Newcomers moving from outside to inside. Psycho- logical Bulletin, 87: 601-618.
  • Weiner, Y.1988. Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, 13: 534-545.
  • Weiss, H., & Adler, S. 1984. Personality and organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 4: 1-50. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Wilkins, A., & Ouchi, W. 1983. Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 468-481.
  • Wright, J., & Mischel, W. 1987. A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 1159- 1177.