You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Managers Handling Disputes: Third-Party Roles and Perceptions of Fairness
Rekha Karambayya and Jeanne M. Brett
The Academy of Management Journal
Vol. 32, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp. 687-704
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/256564
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mediation, Simulations, Procedural justice, Distributive justice, Fairness, Alternative dispute resolution, Social psychology, Arbitration, Justice, Internships
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study investigated how managers resolve disputes in organizations, comparing a typology of managerial third-party dispute-resolution behavior drawn from prior research to the behavior of management students playing third parties in dispute-resolution simulations. We evaluated the third parties' behavior against standard measures of procedural and distributive justice, making this the first study of managerial dispute-resolution behavior that investigates the relationships among third-party behavior, the type of resolution achieved, and perceptions of justice.
The Academy of Management Journal © 1989 Academy of Management