You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Distributional Relationship between the Bottom Fauna and Plant Detritus in Streams
H. J. Egglishaw
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 33, No. 3 (Oct., 1964), pp. 463-476
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2566
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Fauna, Animals, Plants, Streams, Larvae, Bricks, Aggregation, Correlation coefficients, Mosses, Freshwater ecology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Monthly samples, containing bottom fauna, plant detritus and inorganic matter, taken from the bed of a riffle in a stream, the Shelligan Burn, showed that the distribution of the bottom fauna was significantly correlated with the distribution of the plant detritus in the riffle. The distributions of Leuctra inermis, Amphinemura sulcicollis, Baetis spp., Rhithrogena sp. and Chironomidae (together comprising almost 70% of the fauna collected) were closely correlated with the distribution of plant detritus in the riffle. The distribution of Chloroperla torrentium was usually random and not related to the distribution of plant detritus. The distributions of the larvae of Simulium spp. and Hydroptilidae were shown not to be related to the distribution of plant detritus. Experimental evidence, from studying the aggregation of animals in trays, containing different amounts of plant detritus, set into the bed of the stream, showed that the similarity in the distribution patterns of the bottom fauna organisms and plant detritus in the riffle was not due solely to the operation of some external factor. In another stream, Allt dos Mhuicarain, which was chemically poorer than the Shelligan Burn, there were far fewer animals but the amount of plant detritus present was at least equal to that in the Shelligan Burn. The regression of animals on plant detritus in the Shelligan Burn, was much greater than the regression in Allt dos Mhuicarain. Insufficient variation of samples from the headwaters of the River Almond probably accounts for the relationship between the bottom fauna and plant detritus being demonstrated for only three of eight series of samples from this stream.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1964 British Ecological Society