You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Writing, Interpretation, and the Book of Esther: A Detour via Browning and Derrida
The Yearbook of English Studies
Vol. 39, No. 1/2, Literature and Religion (2009), pp. 58-71
Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25679860
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although the Book of Esther is well known in Jewish tradition for its inauguration of the popular festival of Purim, it is a marginal book in Christian tradition because of the interpretative difficulties it presents to its readers. The story itself pre-empts such problems of reading and interpretation: an irreversible edict ordering the annihilation of the Jews is apparently overturned, and the reading of forgotten chronicles reverses the protagonists' destinies. This essay considers those moments when the biblical book is invoked for what it says about writing, with special focus on the literary borrowings of Robert Browning in The Ring and the Book (1868) and Jacques Derrida in 'Envois' (1987). These authors' reflections on the complications of reading and suspicions about the destiny of writing not only pre-empt Esther's own colourful and varied reception history, but offer a challenge to triumphalist interpretation.
The Yearbook of English Studies © 2009 Modern Humanities Research Association