Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Temporal autocorrelation functions for movement rates from global positioning system radiotelemetry data

Mark S. Boyce, Justin Pitt, Joseph M. Northrup, Andrea T. Morehouse, Kyle H. Knopff, Bogdan Cristescu and Gordon B. Stenhouse
Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences
Vol. 365, No. 1550, Challenges and opportunities of using GPS-based location data in animal ecology (27 July 2010), pp. 2213-2219
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25699242
Page Count: 7
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Temporal autocorrelation functions for movement rates from global positioning system radiotelemetry data
Preview not available

Abstract

Autocorrelation has been viewed as a problem in telemetry studies because sequential observations are not independent in time or space, therefore violating assumptions for statistical inference. Yet nearly all ecological and behavioural data are autocorrelated in both space and time. We argue that there is much to learn about the structure of ecological and behavioural data from patterns of autocorrelation. Such patterns include periodicity in movement and patchiness in spatial data, which can be characterized by an autocorrelogram, semivariogram or spectrum. We illustrate the utility of temporal autocorrelation functions (ACFs) for analysing step-length data from GPS telemetry of wolves (Canis lupus), cougars (Puma concolor), grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) and elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Alberta. ACFs often differ by season, reflecting differences in foraging behaviour. In wilderness landscapes, step-length ACFs for predators decay slowly to apparently random patterns, but sometimes display strong daily rhythms in areas of human disturbance. In contrast, step lengths of elk are consistently periodic, reflecting crepuscular activity.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
2213
    2213
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2214
    2214
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2215
    2215
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2216
    2216
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2217
    2217
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2218
    2218
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2219
    2219