You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Justifying terminal care by 'retrospective quality-adjusted life-years'
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 36, No. 5 (May 2010), pp. 290-292
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25699655
Page Count: 3
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A lot of medical procedures can be justified in terms of the number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) they can be expected to generate; that is, the number of extra years that the procedure will provide, with the quality of life during those extra years factored in. QALYs are a crude tool, but good enough for many decisions. Notoriously, however, they cannot justify spending any money on terminal care (and indeed on older people in general). In this paper I suggest a different way of construing 'quality' (as meaningfulness rather than physical comfort) and 'life' (as both backward-looking and forward-looking), so that the terminal patient's efforts to find meaning in his life could in principle generate plenty of 'retrospective QALYs' to justify funding.
Journal of Medical Ethics © 2010 BMJ