You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Post-Westphalia and Its Discontents: Business, Globalization, and Human Rights in Political and Moral Perspective
Michael A. Santoro
Business Ethics Quarterly
Vol. 20, No. 2 (April 2010), pp. 285-297
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25702399
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Human rights, Morality, Political legitimacy, Globalization, Corporate responsibility, Business ethics, Political power, Complicity, Human rights violations, Political ethics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article examines the presuppositions and theoretical frameworks of the "new-wave" "Post-Westphalian" approach to international business ethics and compares it to the more philosophically oriented moral theory approach that has predominated in the field. I contrast one author's Post-Westphalian political approach to the human rights responsibilities of transnational corporations (TNCs) with my own "Fair Share" theory of moral responsibility for human rights. I suggest how the debate about the meaning of corporate human rights "complicity" might be informed by the fair share theory. While I point out that Post-Westphalians and moral philosophers may have fundamental disagreements about basic concepts such as legitimacy, justice, and democratic deliberation, I conclude that the Post-Westphalians have made a major contribution to the expansion of the field by presenting business ethicists with an opportunity to inform and guide debates about the potential future course of transnational governance.
Business Ethics Quarterly © 2010 Cambridge University Press