Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Measuring Managers' Minds: A Critical Reply to Robey and Taggart

David M. Schweiger
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 8, No. 1 (Jan., 1983), pp. 143-151
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/257176
Page Count: 9
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($29.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Measuring Managers' Minds: A Critical Reply to Robey and Taggart
Preview not available

Abstract

Recent interest in studying "managerial cognitive styles" has led to the development and use of a variety of instruments. This paper discusses the importance of instrument description, classification, and evaluation by taking issue with several points made by Robey and Taggart (1981) in a recent issue of the Academy of Management Review. Recommendations also are made concerning those criteria that are critical in the development and/or evaluation of cognitive style instruments.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
143
    143
  • Thumbnail: Page 
144
    144
  • Thumbnail: Page 
145
    145
  • Thumbnail: Page 
146
    146
  • Thumbnail: Page 
147
    147
  • Thumbnail: Page 
148
    148
  • Thumbnail: Page 
149
    149
  • Thumbnail: Page 
150
    150
  • Thumbnail: Page 
151
    151