You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Butler Amendment: An Analysis by a Non-Lawyer
John R. Schmidhauser
American Bar Association Journal
Vol. 43, No. 8 (AUGUST 1957), pp. 714-717, 761-764
Published by: American Bar Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25720092
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Chief justice, Supreme Court justices, Age, Judicial system, Mandatory retirement, United States Senate, Court orders, Retirement, Appellate jurisdictions, Senators
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The so-called Butler Amendment deals with the Supreme Court of the United States. It would fix the number of Justices at nine, provide for compulsory retirement of members of the Court at the age of 75, prohibit members of the Court from running for President, and secure the appellate jurisdiction of the Court in all cases arising under the Constitution. The provisions of the amendment, several of which have been endorsed by the House of Delegates of the Association, might easily work a considerable alteration in future history if it is adopted. Mr. Schmidhauser examines the proposal and the arguments pro and con.
American Bar Association Journal © 1957 American Bar Association