Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Judicial Evaluation—the Counterpart to Merit Selection

Henry T. Reath
American Bar Association Journal
Vol. 60, No. 10 (October 1974), pp. 1246-1248
Published by: American Bar Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25726913
Page Count: 3
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Judicial Evaluation—the Counterpart to Merit Selection
Preview not available

Abstract

Now, more than ever before in our history, we must begin to rebuild and strengthen a competent and truly independent judiciary through a merit selection process beyond the reach or control of partisan politics. Effective merit selection and retention of judges is the key to revitalizing the judicial branch of government, and effective judicial evaluation is the indispensable counterpart to make merit selection and retention work.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1246
    1246
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1247
    1247
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1248
    1248