You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Judicial Evaluation—the Counterpart to Merit Selection
Henry T. Reath
American Bar Association Journal
Vol. 60, No. 10 (October 1974), pp. 1246-1248
Published by: American Bar Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25726913
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Judges, Political partisanship, Judicial system, Attorneys, Bar associations, Incumbents, Questionnaires, Political elections, Specialized committees, Political campaigns
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Now, more than ever before in our history, we must begin to rebuild and strengthen a competent and truly independent judiciary through a merit selection process beyond the reach or control of partisan politics. Effective merit selection and retention of judges is the key to revitalizing the judicial branch of government, and effective judicial evaluation is the indispensable counterpart to make merit selection and retention work.
American Bar Association Journal © 1974 American Bar Association