Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins

Katherine A. Cronin, Kori K. E. Schroeder and Charles T. Snowdon
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 277, No. 1701 (22 December 2010), pp. 3845-3851
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25749280
Page Count: 7
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins
Preview not available

Abstract

The cooperative breeding hypothesis posits that cooperatively breeding species are motivated to act prosocially, that is, to behave in ways that provide benefits to others, and that cooperative breeding has played a central role in the evolution of human prosociality. However, investigations of prosocial behaviour in cooperative breeders have produced varying results and the mechanisms contributing to this variation are unknown. We investigated whether reciprocity would facilitate prosocial behaviour among cottontop tamarins, a cooperatively breeding primate species likely to engage in reciprocal altruism, by comparing the number of food rewards transferred to partners who had either immediately previously provided or denied rewards to the subject. Subjects were also tested in a non-social control condition. Overall, results indicated that reciprocity increased food transfers. However, temporal analyses revealed that when the tamarins' behaviour was evaluated in relation to the non-social control, results were best explained by (i) an initial depression in the transfer of rewards to partners who recently denied rewards, and (ii) a prosocial effect that emerged late in sessions independent of reciprocity. These results support the cooperative breeding hypothesis, but suggest a minimal role for positive reciprocity, and emphasize the importance of investigating proximate temporal mechanisms underlying prosocial behaviour.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
3845
    3845
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3846
    3846
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3847
    3847
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3848
    3848
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3849
    3849
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3850
    3850
  • Thumbnail: Page 
3851
    3851