You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Intragenerational versus Intergenerational Mobility in Relation to Sociopolitical Attitudes
Joseph Lopreato and Lawrence E. Hazelrigg
Vol. 49, No. 2 (Dec., 1970), pp. 200-210
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2576520
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Conceptualization, Social mobility, Political attitudes, Middle class, Sons, Political sociology, Industrial societies, Working class, Political parties, Age distribution
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Recent work in stratification has suggested that the extent to which vertical mobility influences sociopolitical attitudes depends on whether the mobility is intergenerational or intragenerational. In an effort to clarify previous statements of the issue, we suggest that (1) the validity of the proposition depends in turn on the manner in which mobility is conceptualized, and (2) any differences between the two types of mobility can be interpreted in terms of differential resistance to resocialization into the political perspectives of the class of destination. Using survey data from Italy, and focusing on upward mobility, according to one specific conceptualization of mobility, the intragenerational achievers are found to be more resistant to resocialization into middle-class political perspectives than intergenerational achievers. Explanation of this finding makes reference to the selection processes of formal education and to the obstacles encountered in career ascent.