You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
HOW HAPPY WAS SHAKESPEARE WITH THE PRINTED VERSIONS OF HIS PLAYS?
E. A. J. Honigmann
The Modern Language Review
Vol. 105, No. 4 (October 2010), pp. 937-951
Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25801484
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Theater, Sonnets, Publishing industry, Printing, Piracy, Theater criticism, Book dedications, Authors, Literature, Writing
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Three of Shakespeare's quartos were reissued in 'corrected and augmented' versions, presumably by the author. Why only three? And why did Shakespeare stop writing new plays in 1613? At this time Ben Jonson was editing his Folio collection (c. 1612-16), and the Workes of King James (1616) were also in preparation. It is suggested that Shakespeare and three colleagues (Heminge, Condell, and Burbage) held preliminary discussions at about this time, looking forward to the publication of the First Folio (1623). They are likely to have considered the genre and chronology of the plays, editorial policies, Jonson's role, even the dedication to Pembroke and Montgomery, and the exclusion of the Sonnets.
The Modern Language Review © 2010 Modern Humanities Research Association