You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Psychological versus Sociological Perspectives on Suicide: A Reply to Mauk, Taylor, White, and Allen
Steven Stack and Jim Gundlach
Vol. 72, No. 4 (Jun., 1994), pp. 1257-1261
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2580304
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Suicide, Subcultures, Environmental social sciences, Country music, Ecological modeling, Suicide rates, Psychological autopsy, Alcohol drinking, Heavy metals, Social psychology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This article addresses three issues raised in Mauk et al.'s (1994) article on country music and suicide. First, Mauk et al.'s charge that suicide is an individual act that cannot be assessed through group statistics is a paradigmatic critique that can be leveled against the bulk of sociological work on suicide. The position of Mauk et al. is precisely that which Durkheim ( 1966) polemicized against in order to legitimate the discipline of sociology in the nineteenth century. Second, their notion that "psychological autopsies" constitute the only legitimate methodology for studying suicide is an overstatement. Third, the noted ecological fallacy problems can, in fact, be remedied through properly specified models. Many ecological relationships involving suicide have been replicated with individual-level data. Fourth, the charges that our subcultural argument is "barely implied" and that the notion of a country music subculture is a myth are inaccurate. We reiterate our subcultural theory as well as the evidence in support of such a subculture.