Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions

Kwangsun Yoon
The Journal of the Operational Research Society
Vol. 38, No. 3 (Mar., 1987), pp. 277-286
DOI: 10.2307/2581948
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2581948
Page Count: 10
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions
Preview not available

Abstract

The application of compromise solutions to discrete multi-objective problems brings about some technical flexibilities, such as the selection of distance function for computing both normalized attribute ratings and distances between two alternatives, and the choice between the ideal and negative-ideal alternatives for implementing the axiom of choice. These flexibilities are undesirable, since the method may yield conflicting preference-alternative rankings, depending on parameter choice. This paper introduces a credibility measurement of distance function and takes a broader concept of the axiom of choice in order to reconcile disagreement among compromise solutions.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
277
    277
  • Thumbnail: Page 
278
    278
  • Thumbnail: Page 
279
    279
  • Thumbnail: Page 
280
    280
  • Thumbnail: Page 
281
    281
  • Thumbnail: Page 
282
    282
  • Thumbnail: Page 
283
    283
  • Thumbnail: Page 
284
    284
  • Thumbnail: Page 
285
    285
  • Thumbnail: Page 
286
    286