You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Every Reference Librarian a Reviewer
Vol. 26, No. 4 (Summer 1987), pp. 467-476
Published by: American Library Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25827919
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The process a reference book reviewer engages in when reviewing a new reference work is very similar to the process a reference librarian engages in, or at least should engage in, when using a reference collection to fulfill a patron's information need. Reference librarians ought to learn each reference work well enough, in effect, to review it for a patron who must judge and use the information a source contains or leads to. Reference librarians have not demonstrated a strong willingness to give such reviews; in fact, some libraries have policies forbidding them to do so in certain cases. The quality of library service will improve if reference librarians come to view this day-to-day, unwritten reviewing of reference works as an essential part of their role as intermediaries between patrons and information sources in all formats.
RQ © 1987 American Library Association