Building Theories from Case Study Research

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 532-550
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL:
Page Count: 19
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Building Theories from Case Study Research


This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case studies-from specifying the research questions to reaching closure. Some features of the process, such as problem definition and construct validation, are similar to hypothesis-testing research. Others, such as within-case analysis and replication logic, are unique to the inductive, case-oriented process. Overall, the process described here is highly iterative and tightly linked to data. This research approach is especially appropriate in new topic areas. The resultant theory is often novel, testable, and empirically valid. Finally, framebreaking insights, the tests of good theory (e.g., parsimony, logical coherence), and convincing grounding in the evidence are the key criteria for evaluating this type of research.

Notes and References

This item contains 41 references.

  • Abbott, A. (1988, September) Workshop on sequence meth- ods. National Science Foundation Conference on Longi- tudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin.
  • Allison, G. (1971) Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Anderson, P. (1983) Decision making by objection and the Cuban missile crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 201-222.
  • Bartunek, J. (1988) The dynamics of personal and organiza- tional reframing. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Para- dox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137-162). Cam- bridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Bettenhausen, K., & Murnighan, J. K. (1986) The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin- istrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350-372.
  • Bourgeois, L., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988) Strategic decision pro- cesses in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34, 816- 835.
  • Burgelman, R. (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in a major diversified firm. Administrative Sci- ence Quarterly, 28, 223-244.
  • Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1988) Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Eisenhardt, K. (in press) Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal.
  • Eisenhardt, K., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high velocity environments: Toward a mid-range theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737-770.
  • Gersick, C. (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Man- agement Journal, 31, 9-41.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929- 964.
  • Harris, S., & Sutton, R. (1986) Functions of parting ceremo- nies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 5-30.
  • Jick, T. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
  • Kidder, T. (1982) Soul of a new machine. New York: Avon.
  • Kimberly, J. (1988) A review of Walter R. Nord and Sharon Tucker: Implementing routine and radical innovations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 314-316.
  • Kirk, J., & Miller, M. (1986) Reliability and validity in quali- tative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kuhn, T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1988) Synergistic design for case stud- ies: Longitudinal single-site and replicated multiple-site. Paper presented at the National Science Foundation Con- ference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organiza- tions, Austin.
  • McClintock, C., Brannon, D., & Maynard-Moody, S. (1979) Applying the logic of sample surveys to qualitative case studies: The case cluster method. Administrative Science Quarterly, 612-629.
  • Miles, M. (1979) Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 24, 590-601.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984) Qualitative data anal- ysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979) An emerging strategy of "direct" re- search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 580-589.
  • Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160- 197.
  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1982) Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 465-499.
  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980) Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Perrow, C. (1986) Complex organizations (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1973) The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1988) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Paper presented at the National Sci- ence Foundation Conference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1982) Organizations and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Pinfield, L. (1986) A field evaluation of perspectives on orga- nizational decision making. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 31, 365-388.
  • Quinn, J. B. (1980) Strategies for change. Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones Irwin.
  • Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sutton, R., & Callahan, A. (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad- emy of Management Journal, 30, 405-436.
  • Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. S. (in press) Methods to develop a grounded theory of innovation processes in the Minne- sota Innovation Research Program. Organization Sci- ence, 1.
  • Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the field: On writing ethnog- raphy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Yin, R. (1981) The case study crisis: Some answers. Admin- istrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58-65.
  • Yin, R. (1984) Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.