Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:


You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

Roger C. Mayer, James H. Davis and F. David Schoorman
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 20, No. 3 (Jul., 1995), pp. 709-734
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL:
Page Count: 26
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


Scholars in various disciplines have considered the causes, nature, and effects of trust. Prior approaches to studying trust are considered, including characteristics of the trustor, the trustee, and the role of risk. A definition of trust and a model of its antecedents and outcomes are presented, which integrate research from multiple disciplines and differentiate trust from similar constructs. Several research propositions based on the model are presented.

Notes and References

This item contains 75 references.

  • Argyris, C. A.1994. Litigation mentality and organizational learning. In S. B Sitkin & R. J. Bies (Eds.), The legalistic organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Atwater, L. E. 1988. The relative importance of situational and individual variables in pre- dicting leader behavior. Group and Organization Studies, 13: 290-310.
  • Axelrod, R.1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Barber, B.1983. The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Bateson, P.1988. The biological evolution of cooperation and trust. In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust14-30. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Bazerman, M. H.1994. Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.
  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. 1978. Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addi- son-Wesley.
  • Bierman, H., Jr., Bonini, C. P., & Hausman, W. H. 1969. Quantitative analysis for business decisions (3rd ed.).-Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  • Boss, R. W.1978. Trust and managerial problem solving revisited. Group and Organization Studies. 3: 331-342.
  • Boyle, R., & Bonacich, P. 1970. The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motive games. Sociometry, 33: 123-139.
  • Butler, J. K.1983. Reciprocity of trust between professionals and their secretaries. Psycho- logical Reports. 53: 411-416.
  • Butler, J. K.1991. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17: 643-663.
  • Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. 1984. A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55: 19-28.
  • Coleman, J. S.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Conlon, E. J., & Mayer, R. C. 1994. The effect of trust on principal-agent dyads: An empirical investigation of stewardship and agency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX.
  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
  • Cummings, L. L.1983. Performance-evaluation systems in context of individual trust and commitment. In F. J. Landy, S. Zedrick, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory89-93. Hillsdale, N.J: Earlbaum.
  • Dasgupta, P.1988. Trust as a commodity. In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust49-72. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Davis, J., Helms, L., & Henkin, A. B. 1989. Strategic conventions in organizational decision making: Applications from game theory. International Review of Modern Sociology. 19: 71-85.
  • Deutsch, M.1958. Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 265-279.
  • Deutsch, M.1960. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13: 123-140.
  • Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1): 49-64.
  • Driscoll, J. W.1978. Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 44-56.
  • Farnham, A.1989. The trust gap. Fortune, Dec.4: 56-78.
  • Farris, G., Senner, E., & Butterfield, D. 1973. Trust, culture, and organizational behavior. Industrial Relations. 12: 144-157.
  • Friedland, N.1990. Attribution of control as a determinant of cooperation in exchange in- teractions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.20: 303-320.
  • Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R. C. 1978. Some correlates of trust. Journal of Psychology, 99: 103-108.
  • Gabarro, J.1978. The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior: Communication and understanding in relation- ships290-303. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Gambetta, D. G. (Ed.). 1988. Can we trust trust? In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust213-237. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Giffin, K.1967. The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication department. Psychological Bulletin, 68: 104-120.
  • Golembiewski, R. T., & McConkie, M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes. New York: Wiley.
  • Good, D.1988. Individuals, interpersonal relations, and trust. In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust 131-185. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Granovetter, M.1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91: 481-510.
  • Hart, K. M., Capps, H. R., Cangemi, J. P., & Caillouet, L. M. 1986. Exploring organizational trust and its multiple dimensions: A case study of General Motors. Organization Devel- opment Journal, 4(2): 31-39.
  • Hofstede, G.1980. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics. 9(1): 42-63.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. 1953. Communication and persuasion. New Ha- ven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Jackson, S. E., & Alvarez, E. B. 1992. Working through diversity as a strategic imperative. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace13-29. New York: Guilford Press.
  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. S., & Brett, J. M. 1982. Causal analysis: Models, assumptions, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Jamieson, D., & O'Mara, J. 1991. Managing workforce 2000: Gaining the diversity advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
  • Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. 1982. Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Con- struction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology, 43: 1306-1317.
  • Jones, A. P., James, L. R., & Bruni, J. R. 1975. Perceived leadership behavior and employee confidence in the leader as moderated by job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 60: 146-149.
  • Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. 1970. Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 14: 357-366.
  • Kruglanski, A. W.1970. Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6: 214-232.
  • Larson, C. E., & LaFasto, F. M. J. 1989. Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Larzelere, R., & Huston, T. 1980. The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42: 595-604.
  • Lawler, E.1992. The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63: 967-985.
  • Lieberman, J. K.1981. The litigious society. New York: Basic Books.
  • Luhmann, N.1988. Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. G. Gam- betta (Ed.), Trust94-107. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manage- ment Science, 33: 1404-1418.
  • McFall, L.1987. Integrity. Ethics, 98: 5-20.
  • Meyer, J. W.1983. Organizational factors affecting legalization in education. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality217-232. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1992. Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Mishra, A. K. In press. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Moore, S. F., Shaffer, L. S., Pollak, E. L., & Taylor-Lemcke, P. 1987. The effects of interper- sonal trust and prior common problem experience on common management. Journal of Social Psychology, 127: 19-29.
  • Newcomb, T. M.1956. The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11: 575-586.
  • Riker, W. H.1974. The nature of trust. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power 63-81. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Ring, S. M., & Van de Ven, A. 1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organi- zations. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 483-498.
  • Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. 1977. Influence of subordinate characteristics on trust and use of participative decision strategies in a management simulation. Journal of Applied Psy- chology, 62: 628-631.
  • Rotter, J. B.1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Person- ality, 35: 651-665.
  • Runkel, P. J., & McGrath, J. E. 1972. Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Sabatelli, R. M., Buck, R., & Dreyer, A. 1983. Locus of control, interpersonal trust, and nonverbal communication accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44: 399-409.
  • Schlenker, B., Helm, B., & Tedeschi, J. 1973. The effects of personality and situational vari- ables on behavioral trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 25: 419-427.
  • Scott, C. L., III. 1980. Interpersonal trust: A comparison of attitudinal and situational factors. Human Relations, 33: 805-812.
  • Scott, D.1980. The causal relationship between trust and the assessed value of management by objectives. Journal of Management, 6: 157-175.
  • Sitkin, S. B, & Bies, R. J. 1994. The legalization of organizations: A multitheoretical perspec- tive. In S. B Sitkin & R. J. Bies (Eds.), The legalistic organization19-49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sitkin, S. B, & Pablo, A. L. 1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad- emy of Management Review, 17: 9-38.
  • Sitkin, S. B, & Roth, N. L. 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4: 367-392.
  • Solomon, L.1960. The influence of some types of power relationships and game strategies upon the development of interpersonal trust. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychol- ogy, 61: 223-230.
  • Strickland, L. H.1958. Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26: 200-215.
  • Taylor, R. G.1989. The role of trust in labor-management relations. Organization Develop- ment Journal, 7: 85-89.
  • Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Wilson, J. M. 1991. Empowered teams: Creating self- directed work groups that improve quality, productivity, and participation. San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Williamson, 0. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
  • Zand, D. E.1972. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 229-239.