You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Reducing Control Loss in Organizations: The Implications of Dual Hierarchies, Mentoring and Strengthening Vertical Dyadic Linkages
Martin G. Evans
Vol. 30, No. 2 (Feb., 1984), pp. 156-168
Published by: INFORMS
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631815
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mentoring, Mentors, Dyadics, Role conflict, Multilevel models, Simulations, Subordinate personnel, Data collection, Optimal size, Employee supervision
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Using Williamson's (1971) control loss model, the relative merits of dual hierarchies (P. B. Evans 1975), strong vertical dyadic linkages, and mentoring for reducing overall control loss are explored. The potential impact for each organizational structure or process is assessed. Simulations are performed to examine the impact of each of these organizational arrangements for organizations with hierarchical levels ranging from 3 to 11 levels. In addition, the effects of deteriorating control at each level are investigated. In the discussion of appropriate control strategies, a number of other organizational characteristics are discussed. I conclude that: 1. Under conditions of sequential or reciprocal interdependence, building uniformly high control efficiency throughout the organization is essential. 2. In small organizations (and those with high turnover) dual hierarchies and cadre relations are appropriate mechanisms for reducing control loss. 3. In large organizations (and those with low turnover) mentoring and cadres are appropriate.
Management Science © 1984 INFORMS