The Confusion of the Indirect Question and the Relative Clause in Latin

A. F. Bräunlich
Classical Philology
Vol. 13, No. 1 (Jan., 1918), pp. 60-74
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/263750
Page Count: 15
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Confusion of the Indirect Question and the Relative Clause in Latin
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 29 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    Kroll, "Der lateinische Relativsatz," Glotta, III (1910-12), p. 5.
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Hale, The Cum-Constructions (Ithaca, New York, 1887), p. 85
    • German translation (Leipzig, 1891), p. 94
    • Hale-Buck, Latin Grammar (Boston, 1903), p. 260, n. 1, and p. 294, n. 1.
  • 3
    uZu Cicero," Philologus, X (1885), p. 631.
  • 1
    Cic. Rosc. Am. 34. 95 (ed. of Cicero's works [1893-98], Part II, Vol. I, p. 62, line 8).
  • 2
    Baiter-Halm, N.J. für Phil. u. Paed., LXXXIX (1864), p. 629.
  • 3
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • By Hofmann-Andresen, "Ausgewäthlte Briefe" of Cicero (2d ed., 1885), on Fam. xi. 28. 2
    • Bonnet, Le Latin de Grégoire de Tours (Paris, 1890), p. 676, n. 3
    • Kraner-Dittenberger, ed. Caesar, Bellum Gallicum (1890), on vii. 3. 3
    • Sargeaunt, ed. Phormio (1914), on vs. 845.
    • Kroll, op. cit., pp. 4 ff.
    • Trin. 373
    • Trin. 373
    • p. 64, n. 1
  • 4
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • n. 2
    • Hofmann-Andresen on Fam. xi. 28. 2
    • Fügner, Lexicon Livianum (Leipzig, 1897), s.v. audio
    • Schmalz, Lateinische Syntax (4th ed., Munich, 1910), p. 658.
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Hale, Cum- Constructions, pp. 88 ff.
    • German translation, pp. 98 ff.
    • Hale-Buck, Latin Grammar, § 521, 1.
  • 1
    Lindskog, Quaestiones de Parataxi et Hypotaxi apud Priscos Latinos (Lund, 1896), pp. 69 ff. and 75 ff.
  • 2
    Tincani, in his edition of Leg. Manil. (1889)
  • 3
    Lindskog, op. cit., p. 83
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Schmalz, Lateinische Syntax, p. 658
    • Hofmann-Andresen on Cic. Fam. xi. 28. 2.
  • 1
    Hale-Buck, Latin Grammar, § 535, 1a.
  • 2
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Cic. Phil. ii. 3. 7
    • Verr. Act. II, v. 7. 17
    • Frank, " The Influence of the Infinitive upon Verbs Subordinated to It," AJP, XXV [1904], p. 431, note
    • Hale-Buck, § 535, 2a.
  • 1
    Elmer, in his edition (1895)
  • 1
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Frank, " The Influence of the Infinitive upon Verbs Subordinated to It," AJP, XXV, pp. 428 ff.
    • De Orat., and probably Phil., belong to Frank's Group II (pp. 432 and 438 ff.)
    • Frank is right, are not very liable to "attrac- tion" (p. 444).
    • Bonnet, Le Latin de Grégoire de Tours, p. 676, n. 3
  • 1
    Frank, op. cit., p. 446.
  • 3
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Plaut. Most. 969, Rud. 353, Trin. 207
    • Ter. Adel. 572, Hec. 351, Phorm. 876, Adel. 236, Phorm. 845
    • Lucil. 1329.
  • 4
    Lindsay, Latin Language (Oxford, 1904), p. 532.
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Lindsay, Latin Language, p. 209
    • Marx, ed. Lucilius (1904)
  • 2
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • De Orat. ii. 39. 166
    • Fam. iii. 10. 11
    • Leg. Agr. i. 8. 25
    • Quint. Fratr. i. 2. 16
    • Inv. ii. 9. 30
    • Lael. 16. 56
    • Phil. vi. 1. 1
    • De orat. iii. 6. 25.
  • 3
    Pro Flacco 33. 81.
  • 4
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Zielinski's V25 ("Das Clauselgesetz," Philologus, Supplementband IX 11904], 652)
    • op. cit. pp. 603 ff.
    • op. cit., pp. 604 ff. and 729 ff.
  • 5
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Orator 102.
    • Zielinski, Der constructive Rhythmus in Ciceros Reden (Leipzig, 1914), p. 68.
  • 6
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • "clausulae pessimae" (P. 2).
    • V2γ, "Clauselgesetz," p. 652
  • 7
    "Clauselgesetz," p. 658
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Phil. ii. 21. 50
    • "Clauselgesetz," p. 652
    • De Orat. ii. 61. 248
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Zielinski, Der constructive Rhythmus, pp. 13 ff.
    • Der constructive Rhythmus, p. 15
  • 3
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • p. 61, n. 2
    • De Div. i. 38.82
    • Rosc. Am. 34. 95.