You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sexual Size Dimorphism and Reproductive Investment by Female Spiders: A Comparative Analysis
John Prenter, Robert W. Elwood and W. Ian Montgomery
Vol. 53, No. 6 (Dec., 1999), pp. 1987-1994
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640458
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Spiders, Female animals, Clutch size, Sexual dimorphism, Fecundity, Ecological life histories, Evolution, Qualitative comparative analysis, Body size, Phylogeny
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We investigate the association between female reproductive investment, absolute size, and sexual size dimorphism in spiders to test the predictions of the fecundity-advantage hypothesis. The relationships between absolute size and sexual size dimorphism and aspects of female reproductive output are examined in comparative analyses using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We provide support for the idea that allometry for sexual dimorphism is the result of variation in female size more so than male size. Regression analyses suggest selection for increased fecundity in females. We argue that fecundity selection provides the only general explanation for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders.
Evolution © 1999 Society for the Study of Evolution