Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Hierarchical Comparison of Genetic Variance-Covariance Matrices. I. Using the Flury Hierarchy

Patrick C. Phillips and Stevan J. Arnold
Evolution
Vol. 53, No. 5 (Oct., 1999), pp. 1506-1515
DOI: 10.2307/2640896
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640896
Page Count: 10
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($4.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Hierarchical Comparison of Genetic Variance-Covariance Matrices. I. Using the Flury Hierarchy
Preview not available

Abstract

The comparison of additive genetic variance-covariance matrices (G-matrices) is an increasingly popular exercise in evolutionary biology because the evolution of the G-matrix is central to the issue of persistence of genetic constraints and to the use of dynamic models in an evolutionary time frame. The comparison of G-matrices is a nontrivial statistical problem because family structure induces nonindependence among the elements in each matrix. Past solutions to the problem of G-matrix comparison have dealt with this problem, with varying success, but have tested a single null hypothesis (matrix equality or matrix dissimilarity). Because matrices can differ in many ways, several hypotheses are of interest in matrix comparisons. Flury (1988) has provided an approach to matrix comparison in which a variety of hypotheses are tested, including the two extreme hypotheses prevalent in the evolutionary literature. The hypotheses are arranged in a hierarchy and involve comparisons of both the principal components (eigenvectors) and eigenvalues of the matrix. We adapt Flury's hierarchy of tests to the problem of comparing G-matrices by using randomization testing to account for nonindependence induced by family structure. Software has been developed for carrying out this analysis for both genetic and phenotypic data. The method is illustrated with a garter snake test case.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1506
    1506
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1507
    1507
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1508
    1508
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1509
    1509
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1510
    1510
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1511
    1511
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1512
    1512
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1513
    1513
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1514
    1514
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1515
    1515